Meigitaria Sanita
,

The Power of Slow Living: Why Doing Less Can Mean Living More

The Power of Slow Living: Why Doing Less Can Mean Living More

In an age where the average person wakes up to a phone full of notifications, measures productivity in emails sent, and feels guilty for taking a break, the idea of slow living feels almost radical. It’s not about doing everything at a slow pace, nor is it about abandoning ambition. Instead, it’s a conscious choice to live with more intention, depth, and awareness in a culture that rewards speed above all else.

Slow living is less about how fast you move and more about why you move. It’s a philosophy that encourages people to align their daily choices with their values, focusing on what truly matters rather than what’s urgent. It challenges the fast-paced, “always-on” lifestyle and reminds us that sometimes the best way to move forward is to take a step back.

Why the World Needs to Slow Down 

Modern society has perfected the art of busyness. Social media fuels the “always on” mentality, creating a constant comparison loop where everyone seems to be doing more, earning more, and traveling more. The slow living movement stands as a counterweight—a reminder that life is not a checklist but an experience. It has its strong appeal, which is its link to mental well-being.

Moreover, slowing down reduces sensory overload, allowing the mind to process experiences fully. Research in lifestyle psychology shows that living intentionally can improve mood, reduce anxiety, and even enhance creativity. By not overpacking schedules, people permit themselves to rest—something our fast-paced cultures often treat as laziness rather than necessity. This mental approach is not wasted time; it’s active recovery for the mind and body.

From Movement to Lifestyle

What began as a niche lifestyle choice has now become a global conversation. Cities are seeing the rise of slow tourism, where travelers spend more time in one place, getting to know its culture deeply, rather than hopping from one destination to the next. Workplaces are experimenting with four-day workweeks to give employees more time to live beyond their jobs. Even consumer habits are shifting toward buying fewer, higher-quality items that last, reflecting a rejection of disposable culture. Embracing slow living doesn’t require a radical lifestyle change. It can start with these micro-choices that highlight the point that is not to escape life’s demands but to engage with them more mindfully.

Ironically, slowing down can help us achieve more of what we truly want. By focusing our time and energy on what matters, we can cultivate deeper relationships, make more thoughtful decisions, and experience life with greater satisfaction. In a world obsessed with acceleration, slow living isn’t just a lifestyle—it’s a quiet rebellion and, perhaps, the most future-forward way to live.

References

Cohen, E. (2024). Psychology of Slow Living: Rediscovering a Happier Pace of Life. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Rosen, M. (2024, August 8). Why ‘doing nothing, intentionally’ is good for us: The rise of the slow living movement. BBC. Retrieved August 14, 2025, from https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20240724-why-doing-nothing-intentionally-is-good-for-us-the-rise-of-the-slow-living-movement

 

Written by: Thrya Abdulraheem Motea Al-aqab

Edited by: Meigitaria Sanita

Meigitaria Sanita
,

Webinar and Grand Launching of P2A 2025 ‘Creative Home of One ASEAN Community’

Webinar and Grand Launching of P2A 2025 ‘Creative Home of One ASEAN Community’

The International Program Communication (IPC) at UII held a webinar and grand launch of P2A ICE CREAM 2025 on 12 August 2025. This international mobility programme differs significantly from previous years, as while the 2024 edition was held in Indonesia and Malaysia, this year’s programme will take place in Malaysia and Thailand. The journey will commence from 18–30 August 2025.

With the theme ‘Choco’ or ‘Creative Home of One ASEAN Community,’ the train icon is highlighted as a symbol that the journey through Malaysia and Thailand will be undertaken via land routes.

The event was opened by Dr. Herman Felani, a lecturer from the Department of Communications Science at UII, who noted that amid the current challenging situation, crossing national borders has become a real-life experience.

“The world is not currently in a good situation; there are conflicts in many parts of the world, including areas very close to us in ASEAN. Therefore, I think the goal of P2A is to provide opportunities for the young generation in ASEAN to truly experience ASEAN by participating in mobility programs. One of the main concepts of P2A is land mobility traveling across borders,” explained Dr. Herman Felani.

What does P2A ICE CREAM CHOCO 2025 mean? It is an intercultural academic and creative mobility programme involving students from Universitas Islam Indonesia (Indonesia), Universiti Utara Malaysia (Malaysia), Suan Dusit University (Bangkok), and Chiang Mai Rajabhat University (Thailand).

In this project, students from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand will collaborate to produce a digital magazine about Creative Communities in Yogyakarta, Penang, Kedah, Bangkok, and Chiang Mai. Audio-visual media will be incorporated into the magazines via QR codes. The team is divided into three divisions: copywriting, photography, and videography. The team must consult with their supervisors regularly. The topic of the project is Passage to ASEAN International Course on Creative Media: Creative Home of One Community in ASEAN (P2A ICE CREAM CHOCO)

Webinar Topic

To support this programme, students who join this programme will receive an overview of the material provided by Dr. Zaki Habibi and Dr. Asmidah binti Alwi.

Led by Dian Dwi Anisa, M.A., the discussion was interactive. The first material from Dr. Zaki Habibi, a lecturer in the Department of Communications Science at UII, focused on the topic titled ‘Creative Communities as alternative voices in the City: The concepts, the trajectories, and the methods’.

“Each of you, as participants of P2A, can actually stand by your own point of view. Do not leave it behind, because it can expand further during the programme,” he said, opening the discussion.

In general, the material he presented was based on his previous work, publications, and several studies related to a specific project called ‘Managed Urban Creative Activities in Southeast Asia’.

“Most of the cases are from Java as well as Malaysia, particularly Penang. You will see some examples from these places. Beyond that, the following insights also come from several research studies dealing with particular topics such as visual and sensory aspects, the urban environment, festivals, and artistic projects,” he added.

He also invited participants to reflect on various questions such as, “In your own opinion, what makes a city creative?”, “What do you want to see or experience in a creative city?”, and “How can people contribute creatively to make a vibrant yet liveable city?”.

The second presentation was by Dr. Asmidah binti Alwi, a lecturer at SCIMPA UUM, on the topic ‘From cyntok bhatiq to Batik Tanah Lembah Bujang: Creative Community Development’.

Specifically, the material described the process of a creative project that began in 2019. This project focused on creative experiments in designing batik motifs inspired by the unique flora around the University of Northern Malaysia (UUM). In 2020, the project received funding in the form of a grant from the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education. This funding enabled the team to focus their attention and efforts on rural community development through the batik industry. In other words, the project is not only oriented towards art and design but also aims to create positive socio-economic impacts for rural communities through the development of the batik industry as a source of income and community empowerment.

“What started as an art project soon became a bridge between heritage, creativity, and economic opportunities,” said Dr. Asmidah.

‘From a small community initiative to a dynamic creative centre, the Cyntok Bhaiq project has sparked entrepreneurship, created jobs, and strengthened cultural identity through batik art, transforming heritage into opportunities and community pride,’ she said, concluding his presentation.

Support for P2A ICE CREAM Choco from Various Parties

At this grand launch, various forms of support were received. Also joining from P2A ICE CREAM were Ir. Wiryono Raharjo, M.Arch., Ph.D., Vice Rector for Partnerships & Entrepreneurship, Prof. Masduki, Dean of FISB UII, as well as lecturers from Universiti Utara Malaysia (Malaysia), Suan Dusit University (Bangkok), and Chiang Mai Rajabhat University (Thailand).

“The peace campaign in Southeast Asia also involves knowledge exchange beyond the fields of communication, journalism, public relations, and so on. More importantly, there is a strategic programme related to the University of Islam Indonesia. I am confident that this programme will also be more involved in addressing global issues in Southeast Asia, particularly in the area of student mobility. Advancing our university means not only teaching but also involving our students domestically. However, we need to encourage them to venture abroad—to gain experience, build connections, and share, especially our students, both academics and social activists. This is how we bring Yogyakarta’s voice to the world.” Prof. Masduki

“Congratulations to the Department of Communication Studies on the launch of this exciting programme and the implementation of the three-step P2A concept: learning, knowledge, experience, and understanding.” Ir. Wiryono Raharjo, M.Arch., Ph.D.

Meigitaria Sanita
,

Three Malaysian Students Finally Complete ICT Programme

Three Malaysian Students Finally Complete ICT Programme

Three students from Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) have completed one semester of the International Credit Transfer (ICT) programme. The three students are Hareesh Ravi, Adam Danial bin Abdul Shukor, and Ku Mohd Fathi bin Ku Mohd Fauzi.

To mark the conclusion of the ICT program, the Department of Communication Studies at UII held a graduation ceremony on August 8, 2025.

As part of the International Programme Communication (IPC) at UII, the UUM students gained diverse experiences. In addition to academic activities, cultural immersion and exploration of tourist attractions were also conducted to support the ICT programme.

The Head of the Communication Studies, Dr. Zaki Habibi, extended his congratulations, hoping that the meetings and experiences at IPC UII would impart leadership skills.

“Congratulations on completing this programme. Personally, even though this programme has ended, I hope that the encounters, experiences, and the ups and downs, including learning about leadership, are the essence of every mobility programme,” said Dr. Zaki Habibi.

Some of the activities that took place in May 2025 included social engagement in Magelang, where they learned batik making and pottery crafting. A few months prior, the three of them also attended the wedding of one of their colleagues from the Department of Communications at UII. Interacting with the local community and experiencing their culture left a lasting impression on the ICT participants.

The ICT programme not only provides students with experiences but also strengthens the relationships and collaborations established between UII and UUM. This was highlighted by the Head of the Department of Communications, Iwan Awaluddin Yusuf, Ph.D.

“ICT is not just about the friendship between three students but also the good relationship between UII and UUM,” said Iwan Awaluddin Yusuf, Ph.D.

During the farewell event, the three ICT programme students shared their impressions and expressed their gratitude.

For Hareesh Ravi, the ICT programme was a turning point in his life. The Indian-born UUM student said, “Thank you for allowing us to study here. Studying here is not just about learning; it is an experience that has been a turning point for us,” he said.

Meanwhile, his colleague, Ku Mohd Fathi bin Ku Mohd Fauzi, noted that communication in Indonesia is very different from his previous learning experiences in other countries. At UII, communication between lecturers and students is conducted on an equal footing.

“I am happy because here, lecturers and students are very close, the best thing. It’s not just the place but the people—how everyone here strives to do their best, and I will miss that,” he concluded.

Lastly, Adam Danial bin Abdul Shukor expressed his pride in being part of the ICT programme at UII, “I am very proud to study here; the friends, lecturers, and environment are amazing,” he stated.

Meigitaria Sanita
,

Understanding Communication Research: The Three Important Paradigms

Understanding Communication Research: The Three Important Paradigms

In the field of communication research, three major paradigms provide distinct lenses through which we understand human interaction: positivism, constructivism, and critical theory. Each paradigm reflects different assumptions about reality, knowledge, and the role of research. Understanding these paradigms is essential for communication students as they shape not only how research is conducted, but also how communication phenomena are interpreted in academic and real-world contexts. 

The Three Paradigms and How These Paradigms Shape Communication Research

To understand these paradigms better, we need to see how each paradigm leads to different research questions, methods, and goals

  • Positivism: The Objective Lens 

Positivism is grounded in the belief that reality is objective and measurable. It favors quantitative methods, such as experiments and surveys, to identify patterns, causes, and effects in communication. Researchers in this paradigm aim for objectivity, generalization, and prediction. 

Positivist research asks questions like “What effect does social media use have on attention span?” and tests hypotheses using surveys or experiments. The goal is to find cause-and-effect relationships and generalize findings to a larger population. 

  • Constructivism: The Interpretive Lens 

Constructivism holds that reality is socially constructed through language, culture, and context. It emphasizes qualitative methods, such as interviews and observations, to explore how people make meaning in their everyday communication. 

Constructivist research explores questions like “How do teenagers interpret online identity on Instagram?” using interviews, focus groups, or observation. The goal is to deeply understand personal experiences and meanings within specific contexts. 

  • Critical Theory: The Transformative Lens 

Critical theory challenges power structures and seeks to uncover how communication can reproduce or resist social inequality. It often uses critical or emancipatory approaches to expose issues like media bias, gender inequality, and ideological control. 

Critical research might ask “How does media portrayal of minorities reinforce social inequality?” using textual analysis, discourse analysis, or feminist theory. The goal is to reveal hidden power structures and advocate for change. 

By shaping what we ask, how we gather data, and what we do with our findings, these paradigms are more than academic tools—they are foundations for real-world inquiry and impact. 

 Why Communication Students Must Learn These Paradigms  

Communication students must learn these paradigms because doing so equips them with a broader understanding of the field, allowing them to approach communication from multiple perspectives—scientific, humanistic, and political. This knowledge also enhances their research competence, helping them select appropriate methods and justify their choices based on the underlying philosophical stance. Moreover, studying paradigms fosters critical thinking by encouraging students to examine how knowledge is produced and how it influences society. Finally, through engagement with the critical paradigm in particular, students develop ethical insight, becoming more aware of the ethical implications of communication and their responsibilities as communicators. 

 Mastering the three paradigms in communication research is not just about theory—it is about shaping the way communication students see, study, and engage with the world. Whether designing a campaign, writing a thesis, or analyzing a media message, these paradigms provide the foundation for meaningful, impactful work in the communication field. 

References

Adil Abdul Rehman, & Khalid Alharthi. (2016). An introduction to research paradigms.

Researchgate, vol.3, 51-59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325022648_An_introduction_to_research_paradigms

 

Written by: Thrya Abdulraheem Motea Al-aqab

Edited by: Meigitaria Sanita

Meigitaria Sanita
,

Citizen Parliament on Media and Democracy: From Representation to Participation ‘Rethinking Media and Democracy’

International Seminar

The Department of Communications, Universitas Islam Indonesia, successfully held an international seminar titled “Citizen Parliament on Media and Democracy: A Tool for Democratic Renewal” on Thursday, 24 July 2025, Auditorium Room, 3rd Floor, Faculty of Social and Cultural Sciences (FISB), Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII). This seminar featured two esteemed speakers from Charles University, Czech Republic: Prof. Nico Carpentier and Assoc. Prof. Vaia Doudaki. The event aimed to introduce the concept of citizen parliament as a democratic tool and to explore the intersection of media, participation, and democratic renewal.

The event began with welcoming remarks from Iwan Awaluddin Yusuf, S.IP., M.Si., Ph.D., Head of Department, and Prof. Masduki, Dean of the Faculty of Social and Cultural Sciences. They expressed gratitude to the organizing team and highlighted the significance of citizen-driven dialogue in the digital age.

Following this, Dr. Zaki Habibie presented an overview of UII’s Master’s Program in Digital and Environmental Communication, providing context for how digitalization and environmental concerns intersect with communication studies, and the courses within the 4 semesters of this degree . This seminar was part of a broader Visiting Professor initiative designed to enrich academic discourse and curriculum development at UII.

It started by exploring how citizen parliaments—participatory forums where ordinary people discuss public issues—can strengthen democracy, especially in the context of media systems. Drawing from the European MEDEMA Project, Professor Carpentier explained that these forums allow citizens to deliberate, propose solutions, and offer recommendations on how media should function in a democratic society.

Building on this, Associate Professor Vaia Doudaki shared findings from a citizen parliament in the Czech Republic, where a diverse group of 20 citizens gathered to discuss media participation, representation, and regulation. They proposed 51 resolutions, with 31 accepted through consensus. These included calls for more inclusive media, stronger media literacy, protection from monopolies, and increased citizen involvement in public broadcasting.

Things to highlight as a communication student:

One of the most insightful parts of the seminar was when Professor Nico Carpentier explained that democracy is not a fixed concept, but rather an ongoing struggle. He highlighted that while most democracies are built on two core principles—representation and participation—there is often an imbalance between them. When participation is weak or absent, a political gap forms, leaving citizens disconnected from decision-making. Carpentier stressed that this imbalance becomes the subject of continuous political struggle, as different groups try to shape democracy in ways that either expand or restrict participation. In this context, citizen parliaments offer a practical response—creating spaces where ordinary people can deliberate and co-decide, ultimately working to close that gap and renew democratic practice.

It highlighted how democratic renewal is possible when citizens are given real opportunities to engage, and a call to imagine more participatory futures for media and democracy.

This seminar exemplifies UII’s commitment to fostering critical, international, and interdisciplinary dialogue. By introducing the concept of citizen parliaments, the event contributed valuable insight into how democracy can be revitalized through inclusive communication processes.

 

Written by: Thrya Abdulraheem Motea Al-aqab

Edited by: Meigitaria Sanita

Meigitaria Sanita
,

Language in the Digital Age

language

The rapid advancement of technology has fundamentally reshaped how humans communicate. In the digital age, the integration of smartphones, social media, and instant messaging platforms has not only expanded communication channels but also accelerated language change itself. Scholars have increasingly focused on understanding how digital communication affects linguistic structures, communication patterns, and sociolinguistic dynamics.

This article examines the impact of digital media on linguistic simplification, the evolution of communication patterns, and the emergence of new sociolinguistic norms within global communities.

Linguistic Simplification and Creativity in Digital Spaces

One of the most visible impacts of digital communication on language is the trend toward linguistic simplification. Social media platforms like Twitter and TikTok foster shortened expressions through abbreviations, acronyms, and phonetic spellings, often motivated by character limits and the desire for speed. Terms like “LOL” and “OMG” have not only infiltrated casual conversation but also appear increasingly in professional and academic environments.

The global nature of digital platforms further enhances this trend, with similar simplifications observed across languages, such as Spanish and French speakers adapting their forms of phonetic spelling. Additionally, the inclusion of emojis and visual symbols enriches text-based communication, compensating for the absence of non-verbal cues and adding emotional nuance. Digital platforms thus serve as both catalysts of linguistic economy and spaces for creative expression, blurring the boundaries between written and visual language forms.

Transformation of Communication Patterns

Beyond language structure, digital technologies have revolutionized how individuals interact. Social media platforms and instant messaging applications enable real-time, asynchronous, and mass communication, replacing many face-to-face interactions. The formation of online communities around shared interests fosters new communication patterns and linguistic norms, where digital-specific terms like “hashtag” or “retweet” signify not only technology but culture.

Digital environments prioritize brevity and responsiveness, shifting communication toward short-form exchanges that prioritize speed over depth. However, these transformations are not without drawbacks. Online interactions often lack the subtle cues of tone and body language, leading to increased potential for miscommunication. Moreover, the prevalence of echo chambers and algorithmic filtering can narrow linguistic diversity and limit exposure to varied discourse. Nevertheless, digital platforms offer unprecedented opportunities for global discourse and the formation of transnational communication networks.

Sociolinguistic Dynamics and Identity in Digital Spaces

In the digital age, language is a tool for both social belonging and identity construction. Online spaces enable code-switching, hybrid language use, and even the preservation of minority languages, contributing to dynamic sociolinguistic landscapes. Digital communities develop their linguistic norms, fostering inclusivity for some users while marginalizing others due to digital divides or lack of technological access. For multilingual users, the flexibility of switching languages within a single post has become common, reflecting fluid cultural identities.

Influencers and viral content creators further act as agents of linguistic change, popularizing new words and phrases that transcend geographic boundaries. This phenomenon positions social media as a powerful force in shaping both mainstream and subcultural linguistic norms. However, the risks of linguistic homogenization and the dominance of global languages like English highlight the need for continuous monitoring of how digital platforms affect linguistic diversity and cultural representation.

In conclusion, language in the digital age is characterized by simplification, innovation, and adaptability. Social media and digital technologies have not only accelerated the pace of language evolution but also diversified the ways humans express identity and communicate across cultural boundaries. The interplay between linguistic economy, creative expression, and new communication patterns underscores the role of technology in redefining both language structure and sociolinguistic norms. As digital media continues to evolve, its influence on language use and global communication will remain a critical area of research, with implications for education, cultural preservation, and societal interaction.

References

Gershon Kofi Ladzekpo. (2023, December 19). Language and Communication in the Digital Age: The Study of How New Technologies and Digital Media are Affecting Language Use, Communication Patterns, and Sociolinguistic Dynamics. Journal of Literature and Linguistics Studies. file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/Paper+TEMPLATE+Language+and+Communication+in+the+Digital+Age+The+Study+of+How+New+Technologies+and+Digital+Media+are+Affecting+Language+Use,+Communication+Patterns,+and+Sociolinguistic+Dynamics+(2)%20(1).pdf

Lilis Lamsehat Panjaitan1 and Aditya Nur Patria. (2024, December 06). Social Media and Language Evolution: The Impact of Digital Communication on Language Change. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/589737-social-media-and-language-evolution-the-f648e1c9.pdf

Written by: Thrya Abdulraheem Motea Al-aqab

Edited by: Meigitaria Sanita

Meigitaria Sanita
,

Creativity in the Age of AI: Tools, Limits, and Ethics

Creativity in the Age of AI: Tools, Limits, and Ethics

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming various aspects of our lives, ranging from education and healthcare to art and entertainment. In the creative media industry, in particular, AI tools such as ChatGPT, MidJourney, and Adobe Firefly are being utilized to write scripts, design visuals, and even compose music.

While these developments bring exciting opportunities, they also raise serious questions: Can machines truly replace human creativity? What makes humans still important in creative jobs? And how do we address the ethical concerns that AI raises? This article explores what AI can and cannot replace in creative media, highlighting both the positive potential and the important limits.

The Positive Side: AI as a Creative Assistant

AI can help people in creative jobs work faster and more efficiently. For example, video editors now use AI to automatically cut scenes or improve sound quality. Writers can get help generating ideas or correcting grammar. Designers can turn sketches into complete images with a few clicks. These tools save time and make the creative process smoother. In fact, AI can help people with less experience try creative work, such as making music or videos. So, AI is not always replacing humans—it often assists them, helping ideas come to life more quickly.

The Human Touch: What Machines Can’t Replace

However, even with smart tools, there are still things only humans can do. Creativity is not just about making things look good—it’s about meaning, emotion, and culture. A machine might design a logo, but it can’t understand a client’s personal story the same way a human can. Writers bring emotion from real-life experiences. Filmmakers connect with audiences because they understand pain, love, and joy. This human touch—the emotion, empathy, and imagination—is hard for machines to fully copy. AI may generate content, but it can’t create with the same depth, feeling, or purpose that a person brings.

Ethics of AI in media 

 AI can also bring risks—especially in creative jobs. One concern is copyright: Can we use AI-generated content freely? What if AI copies someone else’s style or work without permission? Another issue is job loss. If companies start using AI to replace designers, editors, or writers, what happens to young people trying to enter the industry? There’s also the danger of misinformation. AI can create fake videos or news, which is dangerous in media. Because of these risks, many experts are calling for rules and regulations. There must be clear guidelines about using AI fairly, protecting workers, and avoiding harm.

AI is a powerful tool that is already changing the creative media industry. It can help professionals be more productive and open doors for new creators. But it cannot replace the human mind—the emotions, ethics, and original thinking that fuel true creativity. To use AI well, we must combine the best of both: let machines assist, but let humans lead. As we move forward, we must also build strong rules to ensure AI is used wisely, ethically, and respectfully in the creative world.

References

How generative AI is unlocking creativity. (2024, October 17). Adobe Experience Cloud. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://business.adobe.com/blog/how-generative-ai-unlocking-creativity

Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. (2021, 11). unesco, 1-44. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/in/documentViewer.xhtml?v=2.1.196&id=p::usmarcdef_0000381137&file=/in/rest/annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/attach_import_75c9fb6b-92a6-4982-b772-79f540c9fc39%3F_%3D381137eng.pdf&updateUrl=updateUrl4945&ark=/ark:/48223

Written by: Thrya Abdulraheem Motea Al-aqab

Edited by: Meigitaria Sanita

 

Meigitaria Sanita
,

The Rise of Digital Intimacy: How Online Reactions Shape Modern Relationships

The Rise of Digital Intimacy: How Online Reactions Shape Modern Relationships

In today’s fast-paced digital world, intimacy no longer depends solely on face-to-face conversations or physical closeness. Instead, people now experience and express connection through screens which is a concept known as digital intimacy. Whether it’s liking a photo, replying to a story, or sending an emoji reaction, these small online gestures often carry deep emotional meaning. With the rise of social media platforms like Instagram, WhatsApp, and TikTok, digital intimacy is shaping how people form and maintain relationships in everyday life.

Digital intimacy refers to the closeness and emotional connection people build and feel through digital platforms. Unlike traditional intimacy, which often requires physical presence, digital intimacy can happen instantly across distances. Friends, couples, and even strangers can exchange support, affection, or humor through messages, comments, and reactions. Communication in this context becomes short, fast, and emotionally loaded even a heart emoji or a laughing response can create a sense of being seen, valued, and emotionally connected.

Communication Characteristics and Behavior

The communication in digital intimacy is often asynchronous, visual, and symbolic. People may not speak in full sentences but use images, GIFs, emojis, and voice notes to convey feelings. This non-verbal communication is quick, easy to understand, and emotionally expressive.

Behaviors often seen in digital intimacy include:

  • Regular interaction (likes, replies, shares)
  • Private messages after public engagement (like replying to a story)
  • Sending voice notes or videos to share moments
  • Checking each other’s online presence or last seen

These behaviors reflect a growing comfort in building emotional closeness without physical interaction.

Fast Reactions and Their Role in Building Intimacy

One of the most effective tools in digital intimacy today is the fast reaction feature, like emoji responses to Instagram Stories. These instant reactions allow users to express feelings within seconds, without needing to type a message. This low-effort but high-impact communication makes it easier to maintain consistent contact.

For example:

  • A quick heart-eye emoji on someone’s selfie communicates admiration or affection.
  • A fire emoji can signal excitement or praise.
  • Even a laughing emoji can strengthen a bond by showing shared humor.

These reactions, though simple, often maintain an emotional presence that lets others know “I’m here, I see you, I care,” without needing deep conversations every time.

Digital intimacy has transformed how people experience closeness in the modern world. Through fast, emotionally charged interactions — especially reactions like emojis — people stay connected in ways that feel personal and meaningful. While it may not replace traditional intimacy, digital intimacy offers a new layer of connection that fits the rhythm of digital life. As technology continues to evolve, so will the ways we express love, care, and friendship — often, one tap at a time.

References

Baym. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. williamwolff. https://williamwolff.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/baym-ch1-2015.pdf

Daantje Derks Agneta H Fischer Arjan E R Bos. (2008, may 04). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. ResearchGate. file:///Users/sekprodikomip/Downloads/The_role_of_emotion_in_computer-mediated_communica.pdf

Social networking sites and our lives. (2011, June 16). Internet & Technology. Retrieved July 7, 2025, from https://www.pewinternet.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP-Social-networking-sites-and-our-lives.pdf

Written by: Thrya Abdulraheem Motea Al-aqab

Edited by: Meigitaria Sanita

Meigitaria Sanita
,

Nickel Mining in Raja Ampat: A Communication Science Perspective

Nickel Mining in Raja Ampat: A Communication Science Perspective

Raja Ampat, located in Papua, Indonesia, is one of the planet’s richest areas for marine biodiversity. Its beautiful beaches, colorful corals, and deep-rooted local traditions have made it a destination for tourism and conservation. Yet, this area is now at the center of a growing controversy over nickel mining. The Indonesian government promotes nickel mining for its economic benefits and “downstreaming” policies (increasing domestic processing), but local communities and NGOs worry about its environmental and cultural impacts. In this article, we will explore this issue through the lens of three communication theories, which are the framing theory, agenda-setting theory, and uses and gratifications theory, to understand how media and communication can shape perceptions and policies.

Nickel Mining and Its Impact in Raja Ampat

Nickel is an essential mineral used in batteries, electronics, and stainless steel. Its demand has surged with the global shift towards electric vehicles and renewable energy technologies. The Indonesian government supports mining and processing nickel domestically (downstreaming), citing economic growth and national interests. However, in Raja Ampat, this has caused tension between economic interests and environmental and cultural heritage. Local communities and NGOs have protested, fearing that mining will damage delicate marine ecosystems and disrupt traditional ways of life.

Framing Theory: How Media Shapes the Debate

Framing theory explains how media and communication shape public understanding by highlighting certain angles and downplaying others. In the Raja Ampat debate, national media often frames nickel mining as an economic necessity, focusing on jobs and revenue generation. Meanwhile, NGOs and local media frame it as an environmental threat and a risk to cultural heritage. Framing affects how people understand the issue—those who are exposed to economic framing tend to accept mining policies, while those exposed to environmental framing oppose it.

Agenda-Setting Theory: Influencing What People Care About

Agenda-setting theory argues that the media doesn’t tell people what to think, but what to think about. In the Raja Ampat context, mainstream media often gives more space to government statements about the benefits of nickel mining, making it a priority issue in the public’s mind. Meanwhile, stories about environmental damage or the voices of indigenous communities receive less attention, causing the public to undervalue these perspectives. Understanding this theory highlights the need for balanced media coverage that includes all stakeholders.

Uses and Gratifications Theory: Understanding Stakeholder Media Usage

Uses and gratifications theory focuses on why people use media and what they gain from it. In the Raja Ampat mining debate, different groups use media for different ends:

  • Governments and companies use the media to justify policies and build legitimacy.
  • Local communities and NGOs use media platforms (such as social media) to raise awareness, mobilize support, and voice their concerns.
  • The general public chooses media that confirms their interests, making media literacy vital for understanding the complexities of the issue.

The Role of Communication Science

Communication science can help address the Raja Ampat issue by:

  • Helping stakeholders understand how media framing influences public perceptions.
  • Guiding journalists to cover both economic and environmental angles, ensuring balanced agenda setting.
  • Helping NGOs and communities design media campaigns that resonate with wider audiences, making their concerns harder to ignore.
  • Fostering dialogue between government, businesses, and communities, creating spaces for inclusive conversation.

The nickel mining issue in Raja Ampat is a reminder that economic policies must be balanced with environmental and social priorities. By applying communication theories like framing, agenda setting, and uses and gratifications, we can better understand how media influences perceptions and public debate. This understanding can ultimately help create a more inclusive, transparent, and sustainable approach to resource management that respects both the land and its people.

References

Denty Piawai Nastitie. (2025, june 13). National Human Rights Commission: Nickel Mining in Raja Ampat Violates Public Rights to a Healthy Environment. kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-komnas-ham-tambang-nikel-di-raja-ampat-langgar-hak-publik-atas-lingkungan-hidup-yang-sehat

Tambang di Raja Ampat Berpotensi Konflik Sumber Daya Alam. (2025, June 18). Komnas HAM. Retrieved June 30, 2025, from https://www.komnasham.go.id/komnas-ham-tambang-di-raja-ampat-berpotensi-konflik-sumber-daya-alam

Written by: Thrya Abdulraheem Motea Al-aqab

Edited by: Meigitaria Sanita

Meigitaria Sanita
,

Agenda Setting Theory: How Media Shapes Public Focus 

Agenda Setting Theory: How Media Shapes Public Focus 

Communication theories help us understand how information is transmitted and how it influences individuals, groups, and society. These theories matter because they allow us to critically examine the media’s role in shaping our worldview. One such theory is the Agenda-Setting Theory, which explains how media influences not what people think, but what people think about. In other words, the media has the power to decide which issues are seen as important by the public.

Agenda-Setting Theory was first introduced by Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw in their 1972 study, “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media”. This study focused on the 1968 U.S. presidential election and found that the issues emphasized in the media were the very issues that the public came to regard as most significant. The theory suggests that by giving more coverage to certain topics, the media can make those topics more noticeable, or salient, in the public’s mind.

The core concept of Agenda-Setting Theory is called salience transfer — the process through which the importance of issues in media coverage is transferred to the public agenda. Media outlets decide which stories to highlight, how often to cover them, and how much space or air time to give them. As a result, audiences tend to perceive those stories as more significant.

The theory operates on two levels:

  1. First-level agenda-setting: Focuses on the salience of issues, or which topics matter to the public.
  2. Second-level agenda-setting: Focuses on the salience of attributes, or how certain issues or candidates are framed — for example, what traits or characteristics the media emphasizes.

This theory rests on the assumption that media audiences often rely on media for information. The more the media covers an issue, the more important that issue appears to the public.

The Impact of This Theory

Agenda-setting doesn’t just affect how people talk about events; it has long-term impacts on:

  • Public Awareness: Making certain issues stand out from the rest.
  • Public Opinion: Influencing which topics people consider worth discussing and worrying about.
  • Policy and Political Action: Helping shape priorities for leaders and institutions.

In Indonesia, the extensive media focus on PPKM (Pemberlakuan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat), which is the policy that restricts community activities, and kept this measure at the top of the public agenda. The constant stream of information about case numbers, restrictions, and government policies made PPKM a priority in the public’s daily conversations and influenced behavior across the nation. Another example is the media coverage of climate change. The more media outlets report on rising temperatures, melting glaciers, and extreme weather events, the more these topics dominate public discussions and policy decisions, and the more the media puts a spotlight on them.

Agenda-Setting Theory highlights the powerful role media play in shaping public discourse. While it doesn’t target individual opinions, it sets the boundaries for what people discuss, worry about, and ultimately act upon. In a world full of information, understanding this theory is crucial for becoming more aware of how perceptions are formed and why certain topics dominate the conversation.

References

The Agenda-Setting Role of the News Media. (2019, march). ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332287520_The_Agenda-Setting_Role_of_the_News_Media

Agenda Setting Theory | Media’s Role in Shaping Public Opinion. (2023, April 8). Media Theory. Retrieved June 24, 2025, from https://mediatheory.net/agenda-setting-theory/

Maxwell E. McCombs, Donald L. Shaw. (n.d.). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. JSTOR, VoI.36(No.2), 176-187. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787?seq=7